Re: OpenGL-based framebuffer concepts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/31/06, Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> And it can be done.  The matrox driver in 2.4 can do just that.  For 2.6,
> we have tileblitting which is a drawing method that can handle pure text.
> None of the drivers use this, but vgacon can be trivially written as a
> framebuffer driver that uses tileblitting (instead of the default bitblit).
>
> I believe that there was a vgafb driver before that does exactly what you
> want.

Indeed. Early 2.1.x had a vgafb and an fbcon-vga, before vgacon existed in its
current form.

Moving back to a vgafb with text mode support in fbcon would be one
way to eliminate a few of the way too many graphics drivers. I don't
see any real downside side to doing this, does any one else see any
problems?


--
Jon Smirl
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux