> For a specific DRM chip there are currently four modules:
> fbdev-core
> fbdev-chip depends on fbdev-core
> drm-core
> drm-chip depends on drm-core
> RIght now drm and fbdev can be loaded independently.
>
> I would always keep fbdev-core and drm-core as separate modules. But
> drm-core may become dependent on fbdev-core.
I've already pointed out to Jon the problems with this approach on
numerous occasions and to be honest do not have the time to do so
again,
I will not accept patches to make DRM drivers rely on fbdev drivers in
the kernel for many many many reasons, two quick ones :
a) we don't always have a fully functional fbdev driver, see intel fb drivers.
b) loading fbdev drivers breaks X in a lot of cases, we need to be a
bit more careful.
c) Lots of distros don't use fbdev drivers, forcing this on them to
use drm isn't an option.
should I go on?
I've made suggestions I've given you patches that start the work, I'm
going to finish that work, but I've no timeline, I'd hope at KS/OLS
this year to do it..
Dave.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
