Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)

On 2/20/06, Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I know I am bad for not reporting that earlier but swsusp was working
> > OK for me till about 3 month ago when I started getting "soft lockup
> > detected on CPU0" with no useable backtrace 3 times out of 4. I
> > somehow suspect that having automounted nfs helps it to fail
> > somehow...
>
> Disable soft lockup watchdog :-).

Ok, I will try, but is this the permanent solution you are proposing?

--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 04/20] pspace: Allow multiple instaces of the process id namespace
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 07/22] Hypercall definitions
• Previous by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
• Next by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]