On 2/20/06, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote: > > > > I know I am bad for not reporting that earlier but swsusp was working > > OK for me till about 3 month ago when I started getting "soft lockup > > detected on CPU0" with no useable backtrace 3 times out of 4. I > > somehow suspect that having automounted nfs helps it to fail > > somehow... > > Disable soft lockup watchdog :-). Ok, I will try, but is this the permanent solution you are proposing? -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- References:
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@suspend2.net>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Matthias Hensler <matthias@wspse.de>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@suspend2.net>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 04/20] pspace: Allow multiple instaces of the process id namespace
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 07/22] Hypercall definitions
- Previous by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Next by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Index(es):
![]() |