On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:03:31AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > That's how I understood it, but I only thought about easy cases. Now, > I can imagine cross-FS links and I don't see an easy way to resolve > them :-/ And don't forget automount points too... OG. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Linda Walsh <[email protected]>
- Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Linda Walsh <[email protected]>
- Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Linda Walsh <[email protected]>
- Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Linda Walsh <[email protected]>
- Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- Prev by Date: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- Next by Date: Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
- Previous by thread: Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- Next by thread: Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- Index(es):
 |