Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I have noticed that the new ...at() system calls are named in what
> > appears to be a completely haphazard fashion. In Unix system calls,
> > an f- prefix means it operates on a file descriptor; the -at suffix (a
> > prefix would have been more consistent, but oh well) similarly
> > indicates it operates on a (directory fd, pathname) pair.
> >
> shmat operates on dirfd/pathname?
Do you have a better proposal for naming the interfaces?
Jörg
--
EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[email protected] (uni)
[email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
