On 2/13/06, Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> wrote:
> "D. Hazelton" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Are you accepting such a patch?
> >
> > If his response to the last patch someone provided is any example the answer
> > is going to be no. And I firmly believe the old adage that a leopard can't
> > change it's spots.
>
> Any patch that
>
> - does not break things
>
> - fits into the spirit of the currnt implementation
>
> - offers useful new features
>
> - conforms to coding style standards
>
> - does not need more time to integrate than I would need to
> write this from scratch
>
> Unfortunately, many people who send patches to me do not follow
> these simple rules.
I am still waiting for an answer as to whether such a patch would be
accepted. We will take on the practical details later on.
Jerome
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
