> I don't know exactly why recursion is used to follow symlinks, > which at first thought seems like it could be iterated, but > I've not checked the code, there certainly are specific reasons > for this. the problem is not following symlinks. the problem is symlinks to symlink to symlink to ... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- References:
- max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Linda Walsh <[email protected]>
- Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Linda Walsh <[email protected]>
- Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Linda Walsh <[email protected]>
- Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Linda Walsh <[email protected]>
- Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc3
- Next by Date: Re: [discuss] trap int3 problem while porting a user space application and small cleanup patch
- Previous by thread: Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- Next by thread: Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit?
- Index(es):
 |