Re: SELinux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 21 Jan 2011, at 23:31, Joe Zeff <joe@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> IMO, an unsecured computer on the net is just as much of an attractive 
> nuisance as a swimming pool that's not properly fenced in and the owner 
> is just as liable for any damage.
> 
Your analogy is flawed, as pools are not generally able to conduct remote attacks once compromised. That's why unsecured computers are bad.

On a complete side note, perhaps those worried about unfenced pools should consider keeping a closer eye on the things dear to them that might fall in.

Alan
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux