Re: SELinux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Mike McCarty wrote:


> I can't think of anything that SELinux provides that I want enough
> to load thousands of lines of code concealing defects.

Sorry, misworded that. That should say containing undiscovered

Additionally, I note that quite a bit of the bandwidth on the Fedora
and CentOS echoes relate to SELinux making ordinary people doing
ordinary things difficult. It's a complex subsystem, and I don't need
more complexity on my machine, either just in defective code (which
it certainly must have) or in additional administration requirements.

Anyway, it's enough simply to say that I don't want it, for whatever
reasons, and so I'm on my way not to using any Linux distro which
forces it upon me.

Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux