Re: SELinux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike McCarty wrote:

[...]

> I can't think of anything that SELinux provides that I want enough
> to load thousands of lines of code concealing defects.

Sorry, misworded that. That should say containing undiscovered
defects.

Additionally, I note that quite a bit of the bandwidth on the Fedora
and CentOS echoes relate to SELinux making ordinary people doing
ordinary things difficult. It's a complex subsystem, and I don't need
more complexity on my machine, either just in defective code (which
it certainly must have) or in additional administration requirements.

Anyway, it's enough simply to say that I don't want it, for whatever
reasons, and so I'm on my way not to using any Linux distro which
forces it upon me.

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
-- 
users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux