Re: Why are 0 karma updates still being released?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/02/2010 08:31 PM, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Here is a sampling of the recent updates that have been pushed to
> stable.  There are more, I didn't look at every update.
>
> Released straight to stable:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdb-7.0.1-47.fc12
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ClanLib-2.1.1-1.fc12
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fuse-convmvfs-0.2.5-1.fc12
>
> Pushed to testing and then to stable a few days later with zero karma.
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bti-026-1.fc12
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vidalia-0.2.9-1.fc12
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EekBoek-2.00.02-1.fc12
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fsarchiver-0.6.10-1.fc12
>
> Why are we still pushing to stable or submitting directly to stable
> without people other than the packager testing it?

I can't speak for the specific packages above, but I will sometimes push 
a package stable to Fedora N-1 that is identical to a package in Fedora 
N if the package in Fedora N got sufficient Karma. Maybe that's what 
happened here?



-- 
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761

Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux