On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:30 PM, <homburg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:21:07 -0600 > "Arthur Pemberton" <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> At the risk of being a complete apostate, I have ALWAYS >> > disabled SELinux. Please, no gratuitous lectures. I also >> > absolutely loathe the rhgb. IMHO, these should all be >> > install options, enabled by default with an "expert >> > only" or similar warning. >> >> Re: SELInux? Why do you do so? Ok. Fair enough. But seems like SELinux is like firewalls, and virus scans. Increases security. > Because it serves no purpose - for me. >> >> > This is possibly a business decision because of the >> > amount of time devoted to Bugzilla by Redhat employees. >> >> How is bugzilla related to this? >> > Because Bugzilla causes a considerable consumption of time > by people on RH's payroll. Some of these issues reduce user > errors that get reported as bugs incorrectly. Ok. I'm not following your line or reasoning at all You were talking about SELinux and rghb and then switched to Bugzilla. -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
