Re: The Scope and Ownership of fedora-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Les Mikesell wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
 That's slightly less important in f9 than it used to
be but there are still plenty of things that won't work with openjdk.

True but OpenJDK in Fedora 9 is 100% certified Java

http://developer.redhatmagazine.com/2008/07/08/java-in-fedora-first/

You have argued before that, that the problems are due to the lack of "official java" moniker and that has never really been the case. The problems are either non-standard features used by Java applications or things not covered by the specification.

But that doesn't matter.

Sure, it does. Your claim was incorrect as I told you earlier and this only proves it.

Things work or not.  And without a real Sun
Java which could have been trivial to obtain/install, many things don't work. And instead of providing the trivial help to install a working java, someone must have spent an enormous amount of effort providing something sort-of-like java,

OpenJDK is Fedora 9 is officially Java and certified as such. You cannot continue to claim otherwise. If you still run into problems, you should be filing bug reports.

Rahul

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux