Re: non-disclosure of infrastructure problem a management issue?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 17:05 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:05:11 -0700
> Bruce Byfield <bbyfield@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >  it's not really surprising that interests should conflict
> > occasionally -- or that, in these circumstances, that actions should be
> > based primarily on corporate needs.
> 
> And it shouldn't be surprising that they are being called on it.
> 
> > As for a "public ass-kicking," if you really want to do something
> > effective (as opposed to indulging in self-righteousness), I suggest you
> > contact Red Hat and Fedora officials directly, not merely vent in
> > forums.
> 
> That's what the Fedora Board (or whatever its official name is) is for.
> 
> They should be front-and-center right now handling the public ass-kicking on
> behalf of the community.
----
your perception doesn't match mine as I don't see any public
ass-kicking...I see a few people speculating about what has occurred and
they are projecting their expectations but that doesn't make them
meaningful and in fact looks sloppy at this point.

Craig

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux