Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?
• From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:44:25 +0000 (UTC)
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807131622180.1175@xxxxxxxxxxx> <122063.59731.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <loom.20080714T103731-457@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <orprpf3w9r.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <loom.20080715T172518-529@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)

I wrote:
> Claims to be GPLv2, but only the firmware loader is GPLv2 (actually dual
> GPLv2 or BSD).

Or rather, GPLv2+ or MIT.
So in total, the correct License tag for midisport-firmware would be:
(GPLv2+ or MIT) and Redistributable, no modification permitted

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?
    • From: jeff moe

• References:
  • Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?
    • From: Joe Klemmer
  • Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?
    • From: Antonio Olivares
  • Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?
    • From: Kevin Kofler
  • Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?
    • From: Alexandre Oliva
  • Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?
    • From: Kevin Kofler

• Prev by Date: Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?
• Next by Date: Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?
• Next by thread: Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread