> You're absolutely correct that some don't get credited by GNU+Linux, > but how is that a logical reason to credit the smaller contributor > Linux and not the larger contributor GNU? I didn't say the larger contributors shouldn't get credited. I object to the FSF asking for credit *only for them*. Asking for Linux distros to be called GNU/Linux makes it sound like the FSF created Linux, Firefox, Apache, Perl, Gnome, OO, and all those other big parts of common distros. *That* I object to. If the FSF wants to create their own distro that consists primarily of the Linux kernel and the GNU software, they may call it GNU/Linux (or anything else they choose ;). Asking for anything else to be called GNU/Linux is pure hubris. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
