Alexandre Oliva <aoliva <at> redhat.com> writes: > If you find any such problems in BLAG 80000 (never formally released) > or BLAG 90000 (released easier today), please report them. Here's some I found at a quick glance: http://www.blagblagblag.org/90000/BLAG/RPMS.fedora/zd1211-firmware-1.4-1.noarch.rpm Yes, it says it's GPLv2. Now try looking at the "source code"... See also the Fedora review request (where I raised that point, wondering if this is legal to redistribute at all): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221675#c17 http://www.blagblagblag.org/90000/BLAG/RPMS.fedora/midisport-firmware-1.2-1.noarch.rpm Claims to be GPLv2, but only the firmware loader is GPLv2 (actually dual GPLv2 or BSD). The package also contains firmware files (in /lib/firmware) under the following license: > The firmware files (*.ihx) are copyrighted by Midiman, and can be used > and redistributed only as part of this package. See: http://usb-midi-fw.cvs.sourceforge.net/usb-midi-fw/midisport-firmware/LICENSE?revision=1.1&view=markup http://www.blagblagblag.org/90000/BLAG/RPMS.kriehn/pdftk-1.41-5.fc9.i386.rpm pdftk was dropped from Fedora for licensing reasons: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236310 The files have since been fixed not to claim to be "confidential and proprietary", but the new license is still not acceptable because it forbids use in a nuclear facility. If this is not Free enough for Fedora, how come it is Free enough for BLAG? http://www.blagblagblag.org/90000/BLAG/RPMS.kriehn/msttcore-fonts-2.0-3.fc9.prof_k.noarch.rpm Kept the best one for the end. Does this really need a comment? Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
