On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 13:34 +1000, Res wrote: > On Thu, 1 May 2008, Tim wrote: > > > Sure. The consensus if you want to do something illegal, use something > > else. There's nothing stopping you from doing so, and there's plenty of > > "something elses" for you to use. > > The definition of illegal is wrongly exampled here. I know its been a long > time since I bothered reading fedora EULA, but I must have missed the bit > that said "by use of this software you automatically submit to the non- > exclusive jurisdiction of the U.S courts and its laws" if that's in there, > no wonder I'm not using this crud again. > > A more appropriate response would have been "if you want to do something > that is illegal in your country, use something else", and if unsure, > consult a local lawyer, not a bunch of loonies on the net who all profess > to be legal experts and think the entire world is governed by U.S law, > which thankfully, it aint! Indeed! Here, here. Trouble is their law invariably gets enforced elsewhere due to treaties, alliances, imposed restrictions where charity is given, and other quasi-legal means. And I don't believe they've even heard of the bill of human rights, let alone understand and believe in it. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
