Re: fedora 9 pre release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
jdow wrote:

Rahul, turning your words back on you feel free to explain the technical
issues. This issue has raised enough dust it might be wise to help the
dust settle.

I already did that in the first mail in this thread.

Excuse all of us who don't feel that "If your sound card doesn't work out of the box, file a bug report" isn't an explanation of the technical issues

Nope because that wasn't the first mail in the thread. Pay attention next time.

Funny, my browser thinks <200804181025.49438.lostson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> is the first mail in the thread. It isn't even yours! The first post from you was <4808CFD2.1050805@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> which also contains no technical detail, just a link to a list of things which someone (again not you) thinks could be improved and a suggestion ("why do we need this in the default install?") that it not be run by default.

Taking out something because it isn't perfect is like shooting your seeing eye dog because he has a sore paw. You avoid having to fix the problem but are left in the dark. The administration tool (in alpha) did not seem to want to marked the default card, and after each boot used whatever looks like a sound card on an HDTV Wonder. Probably because the modprobe doesn't seem to set card numbers, or ???

When I finish evaluating ubuntu if FC9 final is out I'll try the process again.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux