On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:48 PM, David G. Mackay <mackay_d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 18:41 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > > Fedora seems to be getting away from this, but one of the selling points > > > for Slackware used to be that you could take some of the older hardware > > > that wouldn't be able to handle the latest Microsoft OS, and still do > > > useful things with it under Linux. > > > > Centos 3.x is still a moderately good choice for this. In fedora terms > > it would be very, very similar to FC1 (2.4 kernel, etc.) but still > > getting updates. > > I was thinking of updating my firewall/router box to Centos 4.6. Do you > have any thoughts/warnings on this? > > > > Dave Why not Centos 5? -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com )
