Re: Java problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Dec 30, 2007 12:26 PM, David Boles <dgboles@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Kam Leo wrote:
> > On Dec 30, 2007 7:25 AM, David Boles <dgboles@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Kam Leo wrote:
> >>
> >>> Why not? IIS has been available for Windows 2000/XP Pro for a long time.
> >>
> >> Perhaps I said that incorrectly.
> >>
> >> "I would not expect a Windows XP Home/PRO computer to be a server
> >> installation for example." because it is not normally done that way.
> >> Installing ISS on Windows XP Home can be done but it not supported
> >> because ISS is not included on the XP Home install disk. You have to use
> >> the ISS from Windows 2000.
> >>
> >> ISS can be added after a normal install of Windows XP PRO and is
> >> included on the XP PRO install disk. The ISS from Windows XP Pro will
> >> not work with XP Home.
> >
> > What is normally done? Apache, Samba and a whole host of other
> > applications are not installed and/or enabled by default, either.
>
>
> I really don't know what is normally done. But since XP PRO is a
> *desktop* install I seriously doubt that "Apache, Samba and a whole host
> of other applications" would be installed at all let alone by default.
> Home is a stripped down PRO so I would think, even more, that these
> would not be defaults.
>
> If I wanted a Windows server I would use Windows 2003 which *is* a server.
>
> As for Linux? If I wanted a server I would install RHEL or CentOS or one
> of several other Linux server installations. I would *not* try to run a
> Linux server system with Fedora. It changes too quickly and too often to
> bother with in the long run. Thirteen months of support before EOL
> compared to 3/4 years is a no brainer.
>
> >
> > How did XP Home get into this conversation?
>
> XP Home and XP PRO are related. Home is XP without the office networking
> stuff. Just what the name implies. XP for use by a home user. And you
> mentioned it. Look about at your quoted section.
>
>   David

Thanks for the diversion. You remind me of a salesman trying to
up-sale a customer a back hoe when all he needs to get the job done is
a shovel.


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux