-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Kam Leo wrote: > On Dec 29, 2007 2:48 PM, David Boles <dgboles@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Neither openSuSE nor Fedora are end-all products. Both distributions > make decent servers. However, neither is ready to replace Microsoft's > Windows OS and the applications for that OS. Some day perhaps; just > not today. I am not familiar openSuSE. But I thought that, from what I have read, that openSuSE was a desktop oriented type distribution. > Fedora is fast paced and has fewer restraints on me with configuring a > system. I learn many things because of that pace. > > Why do I have to exclusively run one variant of Linux? I have multiple > machines which are multi-booted. An again Fedora is a desktop oriented distribution. I see no problem, your choice of course, how many distributions you wish to run. I would not think, if it was me, that I would run a desktop distribution as a true server. May I ask why you do that? When there are several, many, good server oriented distributions, run desktop oriented distributions as servers? - -- David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAkd3D1MACgkQAO0wNI1X4QHibgCg9/Feht+9wA72qs/h2dzbitY/ dHEAoIVRNHzkaUjaoRGUd+RdJ5hrpPDd =TgoZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
