Beartooth (regarding all the Firefox language packs): > I've been doing that, and cursing whoever put them there -- why, why, > why? > > And if there is some sane reason (which I admit is possible), > couldn't we at least have some choice? Some safer and less tedious way > to dump them en masse? I wouldn't mind so much it coming with them all, and checking on them after a Firefox update, but why does it have to have them all enabled all the time? If you got asked, once, what languages can you read, and *that* enabled the right ones, disabled the rest (and in a disabled state they didn't bog down your computer), and *it* would also properly set the HTTP content accept headers, that'd be a good thing. It'd be a good thing, all-round, for avoiding HTTP 406 errors, and stupid websites asking you to click on a flag, if the first use of a browser asked the user what languages they could read, and preferred. -- [tim@bigblack ~]$ uname -ipr 2.6.23.1-10.fc7 i686 i386 Using FC 4, 5, 6 & 7, plus CentOS 5. Today, it's FC7. Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
