Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > This entire thread has used less bandwidth then one of those messages. What is most interesting is that the one message for the OP has generated at least 30 follow-ups with some of them raising questions. Yet, the OP hasn't deemed it necessary to respond and/or clarify what was said. This makes me even more suspicious of the OP's intention or state of mind at the time he posted. Even a *serious* non-English speaker or a speaker with poor writing abilities would have tried to clarify the original message. Was it a troll...or the Guinness talking?
