Re: nvidia

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



on 10/28/2007 4:11 PM, Karl Larsen wrote:
> David Boles wrote:
>> on 10/28/2007 3:04 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>   
>>> Alan Cox wrote:
>>>     
>>>>> But note that there is nothing remotely illegal about the nvidia driver, 
>>>>> nor would there be any problem with the fedora project distributing it 
>>>>> themselves if they had any reason to care about the user experience.
>>>>>         
>>>> Actually the legal state of the Nvidia driver is a matter of debate. Even
>>>> if it was legal it would not meet the Fedora policy, nor be in the
>>>> interests of the project.
>>>>       
>>> When the users' interests aren't the same as the project's interests, 
>>> you have to wonder why there are any users - or how long there will be any.
>>>     
>>
>> The Linux users should get of their collective lazy a$$es and setup their
>> systems to suit themselves if they want to use non FOSS packages.
>>
>> Since the current subject is Nvidia, a Windows install, for example, comes
>> with a 'it works' Nvidia video driver. Just like Linux does. *Not* the
>> fancy one from Nvidia that does all of the fancy stuff. The 'Stupid
>> Windows User' must go to the Nvidia site, find the proper driver for his
>> video card and install it to get the fancy video stuff.
>>
>> So what you are saying or implying here? That 'Stupid Windows Users' know
>> more about their systems and how to set them up than 'Brilliant Linux
>> Users' do?   ;-)
>>   
>     The Windows user has a screen with a pointer on it. He can use that 
> screen forever and be happy. If he is at home and wants to run Flight 
> Simulator he needs to get the better driver and the instruction on 
> flight sim include how to get it.
> 
>     Fedora users discover a broken screen sometimes without a pointer 
> and that is how it works. Stupid since there are alternatives.


I didn't say that you should *not* use the Nvidia drivers Karl. Only that
you should be prepared to do the work needed to do that. And that you
should understand just *why* Fedora can *not* do this. And just why the
people on the 'third party sites' might be a little behind your needs.
Thinks like they might have real jobs. They are doing it because they want
to do it. And for no money. Kinda' hard to be upset with someone who is
giving you their time and efforts for free. That's all.

-- 

  David

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux