On Sun, 2007-28-10 at 14:45 -0600, Karl Larsen wrote: > You didn't need to mention that I have a choice. I can change to > Windows which due to it's cost includes what a person with my computer > needs to work. Fedora does not and plans if your accurate to make it > even harder for a user to use your free product. Why "even harder"? The policy isn't changing. It's the same one that Fedora has always used. > That sounds counter > productive to me. That depends on whether you value software freedom or not. If you do, then Fedora is doing exactly what it should be doing, and a few inconveniences are an acceptable price to pay for maintaining your political and philosophical opinion. If you don't -- if all you want is an operating system that doesn't cost you anything and operates as efficiently as possible -- then, yeah, I suppose it must sound counter-productive. But, in that case, your priorities are greatly out of line with Fedora's. -- Bruce Byfield 604-421-7177 Burnaby, BC, Canada web: http://members.axion.net/~bbyfield blog: http://brucebyfield.wordpress.com/
