Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 20:46 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> jdow wrote: >>> Chu - directing that at greshko might have been more appropriate. >>> "Ed" was most impolite for no good reason. "Scroom and the horse >>> he rode in on," would be a suitable reply for Ed's behavior. >> I'm not sure about "no good reason". Somebody signs up for a mailing list >> with their "normal" email address and it gets harvested and they get more >> spam and then say the distribution is flawed based on that.....well it just >> gets my goat. The induhvidual blames everyone except themselves. >> >> Let's not get into a tit for tat on "behavior" shall we. I can surely point >> out times where others "behavior" went over my line....or is it over your >> line....or is it over some imaginary line.... >> >> The simple point I suppose I should have made is...you put your email >> address on a public list and you expose yourself to spam. Should the email >> list be responsible to protect you from your folly? I think not. >> > Just when were you appointed Fedora's "Defender and Chief"? Never said I was or claimed to be. Some folks enjoy to attach labels. Should I stay silent when an injustice is done? -- Recursion is the root of computation since it trades description for time.
