Re: r300 driver stability

• To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: r300 driver stability
• From: "Andras Simon" <szajmi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:19:23 +0200
• In-reply-to: <cone.1180609441.485078.27857.500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <9008cd5d0705301908hb15e420v9aee01c5fa98165a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <465E2EB3.5000403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9008cd5d0705301916j26258fcek5e9995f00b532b90@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cone.1180578973.446515.12025.500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9008cd5d0705310256g7f423840y2e4361ad5e88b702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cone.1180609441.485078.27857.500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On 5/31/07, Sam Varshavchik <mrsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]

Never mind. It does that sometimes :-)

Andras

• References:
  • r300 driver stability
    • From: Andras Simon
  • Re: r300 driver stability
    • From: Rahul Sundaram
  • Re: r300 driver stability
    • From: Andras Simon
  • Re: r300 driver stability
    • From: Sam Varshavchik
  • Re: r300 driver stability
    • From: Andras Simon
  • Re: r300 driver stability
    • From: Sam Varshavchik

• Prev by Date: Re: OT: Requesting C advice
• Next by Date: time to 64bit?
• Previous by thread: Re: r300 driver stability
• Next by thread: Re: r300 driver stability
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread