Re: r300 driver stability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: r300 driver stability
From: "Andras Simon" <szajmi@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:19:23 +0200
In-reply-to: <cone.1180609441.485078.27857.500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <9008cd5d0705301908hb15e420v9aee01c5fa98165a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <465E2EB3.5000403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9008cd5d0705301916j26258fcek5e9995f00b532b90@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cone.1180578973.446515.12025.500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9008cd5d0705310256g7f423840y2e4361ad5e88b702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cone.1180609441.485078.27857.500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On 5/31/07, Sam Varshavchik <mrsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]


Hmmm, you might be right.  Google let me down :-(


Never mind. It does that sometimes :-)

Andras

References:
- r300 driver stability
  - From: Andras Simon
- Re: r300 driver stability
  - From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: r300 driver stability
  - From: Andras Simon
- Re: r300 driver stability
  - From: Sam Varshavchik
- Re: r300 driver stability
  - From: Andras Simon
- Re: r300 driver stability
  - From: Sam Varshavchik

Prev by Date: Re: OT: Requesting C advice
Next by Date: time to 64bit?
Previous by thread: Re: r300 driver stability
Next by thread: Re: r300 driver stability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux