Re: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mauriat M wrote:
On 5/15/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yep. If half of the people who are willing to discuss the nature of
Fedora in length step further to actually contribute that would make a
pretty big difference but alas folks are more interested in calling it
unstable or wanting the distribution to including proprietary software
by default.

Next time you want to complain ask yourself how much you have
contributed in anyway at all to a every growing collection of Free
software included in a distribution that you can get for free. That
includes a lot of work many of which is volunteer driven in maintaining
around 8000 packages, documentation, artwork, QA, release engineering,
infrastructure, marketing etc.

You can choose to help.

Must I contribute to expect a somewhat stable and useful general
purpose operating system?

TANSTAAFL


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux