Re: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Todd Zullinger wrote:

Not really.  My IQ is at least a few points above 3 (I think) and
AFAICT, the main cause of this is simply a lack of available manpower
to find and fix all of the bugs.  There are not quite 400 people that
maintain at least one of the 4300+ packages in Fedora.  A lot of folks
maintain several.  And that's for at least 3 versions at a time --
more if you count the folks @redhat.com that maintain stuff for RHEL
as well.

To paraphrase Hanlon's razor: never attribute to malice that which
can be adequately explained by lack of volunteers. :)

Yep. If half of the people who are willing to discuss the nature of Fedora in length step further to actually contribute that would make a pretty big difference but alas folks are more interested in calling it unstable or wanting the distribution to including proprietary software by default.

Next time you want to complain ask yourself how much you have contributed in anyway at all to a every growing collection of Free software included in a distribution that you can get for free. That includes a lot of work many of which is volunteer driven in maintaining around 8000 packages, documentation, artwork, QA, release engineering, infrastructure, marketing etc.

You can choose to help.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join

Rahul


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux