> On Tuesday 10 April 2007 05:31, Ed Greshko wrote: >> linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> > I just want to know what other >> > packages are on the Fedora distro that are are missing >> > original functionality simply because of legal issues. >> >> And that would help how? Yes, you'd know what you're missing...but you >> already know you're missing "something" so why not install the >> OpenOffice >> rpms and be assured of missing nothing. >> > No-one is answering the question. Forget the OpenOffice fixation. The > question is 'How do we know which of Fedora's packages have been altered > in > this way?' OpenOffice would be one, but there are others. Totem comes to > mind, and I'd guess that there are lots more. As Les remarked, it could > be > indicated in the package name. > > As for how it would help, we could then decide for ourselves whether we > need > to go to the source and build our own packages. > > Anne > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Personally, I agree with this sentiment 100%. I would like to know which packages are modified by RedHat, and differ from the creator's original.
