Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 10 April 2007 05:31, Ed Greshko wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> > I just want to know what other
> > packages are on the Fedora distro that are are missing
> > original functionality simply because of legal issues.
>
> And that would help how?  Yes, you'd know what you're missing...but you
> already know you're missing "something" so why not install the OpenOffice
> rpms and be assured of missing nothing.
>
No-one is answering the question.  Forget the OpenOffice fixation.  The 
question is 'How do we know which of Fedora's packages have been altered in 
this way?'  OpenOffice would be one, but there are others.  Totem comes to 
mind, and I'd guess that there are lots more.  As Les remarked, it could be 
indicated in the package name.

As for how it would help, we could then decide for ourselves whether we need 
to go to the source and build our own packages.

Anne

Attachment: pgpbEPXwcVUHX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux