Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck

• To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck
• From: Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:32:55 +0800
• In-reply-to: <16de708d0704100143k10745197kec35c2ef84a807b4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <200704091950.59079.linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200704100013.34050.linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx> <461B1326.7080209@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200704100757.52967.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <16de708d0704100143k10745197kec35c2ef84a807b4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2pre) Gecko/20070116 Thunderbird/2.0b2 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666

Arthur Pemberton wrote:

> Have you suffered from any such "stripping"
> before?

I am sure that a particularly nasty cold was caused by that years ago in
Minnesota.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck
    • From: linuxmaillists

• References:
  • Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck
    • From: linuxmaillists
  • Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck
    • From: linuxmaillists
  • Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck
    • From: Ed Greshko
  • Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck
    • From: Anne Wilson
  • Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck
    • From: Arthur Pemberton

• Prev by Date: Re: Raid card for FC6
• Next by Date: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck
• Previous by thread: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck
• Next by thread: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread