Re: Proposed changes for fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Why are the DVDs so small?
At the moment, because Fedora Extras packages don't appear in any formal
ISOs -- the ISOs are the size of Core binaries (compressed), and that's
how big Core is. But it's also because most people install few packages
from Extras (so the majority of a download would be wasted), and because
the mirrors, at least, are concerned about bandwidth.

Not everyone can use BitTorrent -- it's important that Fedora is made
available in other ways (e.g. through mirrors), and many people have
monthly download limits.

> It would be possible to put almost everything in 8.5GB, and use two
> DVDs for people who want to burn their own but lack a modern burner.
> Virtually every recent DVD reader will do double-sided 8.5GB, you need
> it for movies :-(

That does imply tht you're using write-once DVDs for what may well be a
read-once operation. Double-layer rewritable DVDs are not (yet?)


[1] Well, twice if you count the media check...

E-mail:     [email protected] | [Bradford Cathedral] took 194 years to complete. A | construction period of nearly two centuries may seem
                   | ridiculous to us, but of course builders were a lot
                   | quicker in those days.  -- "ISIHAC", BBC Radio 4

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux