Fernando Lozano wrote:
> Hi Ed Greshko,
>
> Very strangem the docs from nVidia itself states you have to use 'load
> "glx"' and that line was generated bu nvidia-xconfig.
It may be strange...but not uncommon. The same thing has happened to me. I
forgot where I got the answer. It may have been in some FAQ on the nvidia site.
But, you will get:
(II) LoadModule: "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so" (glx)
(WW) LoadModule: given non-canonical module name
"/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so
(II) Module glx: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation"
compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.8774
Module class: X.Org Server Extension
ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.1
(II) Loading extension GLX
When it loads correctly. As noted I'm using the 8774 version of the nvidia
drivers.
>
> But it won't hurt trying your sugestion.
No, it won't. And, I think you will be pleased with the results.
Ed
>
> []s, Fernando Lozano
>
>>> (II) LoadModule: "glx"
>>> (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so
>>> (II) Module glx: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
>>> compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.0.0
>>> ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3
>>> (==) AIGLX enabled
>>> (II) Loading extension GLX
>>>
>>
>> Shows that you are not loading the nvidia glx module.
>>
>> Edit your xorg.conf file so that instead of:
>>
>> Load "glx"
>>
>> you have
>>
>> Load "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so"
>>
>> Ed
>>
>>
>
--
'Good and bad is tricky, she [Esme] said. 'I ain't too certain about where
people stand. P'raps what matters is which way you face.'
(Witches Abroad)
