On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 09:30 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Aaron Konstam wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 16:35 +0930, Tim wrote: > [...] > >> You're misusing reply-to, you get to reap the consequences for it. > > I wish we could discuss this off list but you have made that > > impossible. What I ma asking you to do is to use the reply to list > > feature of your email program. It does have one does it not? > > You both appear to be using Evolution, so if there's a list reply in > your mail client Aaron, then there should be on in Tim's. (I have no > idea of Evolution's features. I took a look at it years back and it's > similarity to Outlook combined with it's lack of support for inline > PGP made it a very short look.) > > > Somehow when I reply to a list post the post goes only to the list. > > Why doesn't your replies do that? > > One problem is that you have your address specified in the Reply-to: > header and the list doesn't strip this. It simply adds the list > address to this. So the reply-to in your messages looks like this: > > Reply-To: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, > For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Tim doesn't do this and his address is not in the reply-to. Since > your address is the same in the reply-to as it is in the from header, > adding a reply-to is pointless. If you remove that, you may find that > you get less list mail directed to your personal address. > Your analysis is clear and I have removed the reply to address. Check this message to see if that has happened. I hope everyone will be happy now. ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
