-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 16:35 +0930, Tim wrote:
[...]
>> You're misusing reply-to, you get to reap the consequences for it.
> I wish we could discuss this off list but you have made that
> impossible. What I ma asking you to do is to use the reply to list
> feature of your email program. It does have one does it not?
You both appear to be using Evolution, so if there's a list reply in
your mail client Aaron, then there should be on in Tim's. (I have no
idea of Evolution's features. I took a look at it years back and it's
similarity to Outlook combined with it's lack of support for inline
PGP made it a very short look.)
> Somehow when I reply to a list post the post goes only to the list.
> Why doesn't your replies do that?
One problem is that you have your address specified in the Reply-to:
header and the list doesn't strip this. It simply adds the list
address to this. So the reply-to in your messages looks like this:
Reply-To: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tim doesn't do this and his address is not in the reply-to. Since
your address is the same in the reply-to as it is in the from header,
adding a reply-to is pointless. If you remove that, you may find that
you get less list mail directed to your personal address.
- --
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xD654075A | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
======================================================================
Politeness, n. The most acceptable hypocrisy.
-- Ambrose Bierce
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: When crypto is outlawed bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
iG0EARECAC0FAkShMvkmGGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucG9ib3guY29tL350bXovcGdwL3Rt
ei5hc2MACgkQuv+09NZUB1r1cgCfRSRGlEH21lmsJzwprW7GRYBIkWIAoM5u48+4
Is6nJeY4mI8ARuzITRfo
=TMkU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
