Re: Lucifer Lives (AKA libecal-1.2.so.3)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 16:45 -0400, Beartooth wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 21:51:42 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 16:43 -0400, Beartooth wrote:
> [...]
> 
> >> > If that works, you'll then be in the same boat as the rest of us...
> >>  
> >> Took me a minute to copy that correctly; bash kept reading Pan's line ends
> >> as <enter>. I hope this is the way you meant.
> [...]
> >> error: Failed dependencies:
> >>         evolution-data-server = 1.6.2-1.fc5.1 is needed by (installed)
> >>         evolution-data-server-devel-1.6.2-1.fc5.1.i386
> >> 
> >> What the blinkety-blink-blink : "is needed by (installed)"???
> > 
> > The (installed) is referring to the evolution-data-server-devel package
> > on the next line. I'll assume (possibly incorrectly) that you actually
> > need that package, and suggest the following. More long lines ahead
> > unfortunately.
> > 
> > # wget
> > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/5/i386/evolution-data-server-1.6.1-1.fc5.2.i386.rpm
> > # wget
> > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/5/i386/evolution-data-server-devel-1.6.1-1.fc5.2.i386.rpm
> > # rpm -Uvh --oldpackage evolution-data-server-1.6.1-1.fc5.2.i386.rpm
> > evolution-data-server-devel-1.6.1-1.fc5.2.i386.rpm
> > # yum install gnome-panel
> > 
> > (that's three long commands and a shorter one)
> > 
> >> Anyway, I went ahead, while I was at it : 
> [...]
> >> So *is* that the same boat??
> > 
> > Yes.
> 
> News: this morning I tried "yum install gnome-panel" -- and it worked!
> What's more, it *just* worked -- without even mentioning any dependencies,
> other downloads, or anything.
> 
> So apparently the repos -- or at least the ones my configuration accesses
> -- did indeed catch up.
> 
> I am of course delighted. All the more so, since yum update has just also
> succeeded : 
> Running Transaction
>   Updating  : qt4                          ####################### [ 1/12]
>   Updating  : xffm                         ####################### [ 2/12]
>   Updating  : texmaker                     ####################### [ 3/12]
>   Updating  : jed                          ####################### [ 4/12]
>   Updating  : xfwm4                        ####################### [ 5/12]
>   Updating  : xfprint                      ####################### [ 6/12]
>   Cleanup   : texmaker                     ####################### [ 7/12]
>   Cleanup   : jed                          ####################### [ 8/12]
>   Cleanup   : xfwm4                        ####################### [ 9/12]
>   Cleanup   : qt4                          ####################### [10/12]
>   Cleanup   : xffm                         ####################### [11/12]
>   Cleanup   : xfprint                      ####################### [12/12]
> 
> Updated: jed.i386 0:0.99.18-4.fc5 qt4.i386 0:4.1.3-7.fc5 texmaker.i386 1:1.3-4.fc5 xffm.i386 0:4.2.3-4.fc5 xfprint.i386 0:4.2.3-3.fc5 xfwm4.i386 0:4.2.3.2-5.fc5
> Complete!
> 
> And so has yum clean all. So do I still need to cope with those long
> lines? Or am I safe? Safe enough to close my apps, log out and back in
> (and if necessary reboot), and try to get my Gnome desktop back? 

You're safe. The dependency issues were fixed a day or two ago.

Paul.



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux