I have a server with eth0 (192.168.0.1) and eth1(192.168.254.1) and I
connect by an Ethernet modem (192.168.254.254) by PPoE by eth1.
I get these information from ifconfig and route -n
sbin/ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:D8:BF:9F:05
inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::211:d8ff:febf:9f05/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:72 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:9676 (9.4 KiB)
Interrupt:21
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:05:E5:82:46
inet addr:192.168.254.1 Bcast:192.168.254.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::5054:5ff:fee5:8246/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:888 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:934 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:429031 (418.9 KiB) TX bytes:129154 (126.1 KiB)
Interrupt:21 Base address:0xec00
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:3806 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:3806 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:6875583 (6.5 MiB) TX bytes:6875583 (6.5 MiB)
ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr:87.9.158.250 P-t-P:192.168.100.1 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1492 Metric:1
RX packets:847 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:819 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:3
RX bytes:407494 (397.9 KiB) TX bytes:99093 (96.7 KiB)
/sbin/route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.100.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.254.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
0.0.0.0 192.168.100.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0
Is it correct?? Why a double entry for eth1??
Tnx for help
--
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : antoniomontag
