On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 12:27:56PM +1030, Tim wrote: > Discussed to death here over the last few weeks. But in summary, > "everything" never really installed "everything", and if you actually The point it took to click one checkbox to install a shitload of packages. User attention is a scarce resource. Hard drive space and bandwidth is effectively free. Time is not. > did "install" *everything* you'd have conflicts up to your earholes, not Is "conflicts up to your earlobes" supposed to be a feature? Why can't conflicts be autoresolved? Why are there conflicts in the first place? > to mention masses of updates to manage. If I asked for it, and bandwidth is no issue, I don't see why this is a problem. Please stop rationalizing deficits being features. They're not. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
