On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 16:16 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: > Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-15-02 at 15:28 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: > > > >>Especially I have seen statements > >>about Windows being a CPU hog, when I know it is not. It is, in fact, > >>slightly less CPU intensive than the versions of Linux I have tried > >>(on an unloaded machine) and noticeably faster for loading the programs > >>I use. So I take some time to correct incorrct statements. > > > > > > My experience is completely the opposite: Linux is less CPU intensive > > than Windows on the desktop or on a server. All of my clients have said > > the same thing. > > > > It's strange...I've seen similar claims made directly by Microsoft and > > Microsoft's friends. I smell something fishy. > > Are you saying that I'm a plant or something? ---- no - you're way too disagreeable to be a plant. ;-) Craig
