Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joel Rees wrote:
#4 My comment about WinXP running like a dog was predicated on Windows
98 era systems...i.e. =< 128Mb RAM, =< 600Mhz Pentium III and evidently

Umm, I have a Pentium 90HMz 32MB machine which runs Win98 like a champ,
but just barely chugs with Linux. I haven't loaded WinXP on that
machine. Linux takes about 30 minutes to boot (Knoppix). I'm not sure
XP would fit.


XP would die.

Very possibly. Knoppix has died a few times on that box while trying
to boot.

Suggest netBSD for that ancient box, if you are interested in really

I've got an old copy of FreeBSD, but it does what I need already. Why
change it?

using it. (Unless, of course you have an aging aunt using the box with
dialup and only seeing the web through a non-MSIE browser that does not
do javascript or active-xxx.)

My mother uses it for running games like solitaire, hangman, etc.
We also have some spreadsheets on it which get updated a few times
a year, and printed. It has no connections to a network, nor to the web.
All file transfers take place via floppy disc, so the spreadsheets
can be printed. Information only goes into that box via keyboard
and mouse, and comes out only via display and floppy disc.

Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux