Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On 1/22/06, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nobody stopped anyone from doing the work involved. In fact it was
already done before. http://fedora.isphuset.no/
I think the underlying frustration involving the re-spins is one of
access and branding. You want it to be accessible for people having
problems with the regular installer, but you don't want everyone
assuming its an 'official' iso built by the normal release process.
There is a lot more discussion that needs to happen to see how
respins, which the core maintainers aren't responsible for, should be
branded and should be talked about in easily accessible documentation.
Discussion I was hoping the Foundation could take up at some point.
Can a respin project get their own bugzilla component in the same
bugzilla?
We need to discuss that if only the people who do the work would be
responsive to requests repeatedly.
I keep forgetting to ping the http://fedora.isphuset.no/ guys to make
sure they have written greg concerning trademark permission for the
respins. It's an important usage case, which the trademark policy
should try to explicitly address.
-jef
I wrote to them on several occasions with no response whatsoever. Its
really disappointing.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
