Les Mikesell wrote:
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 12:15, Gene Heskett wrote:
IMO the project should demo that its responsive to the users wishes in
matters such as this. To show that, we'd need to see support for the
eye candy of our choice by rpms instead of being forced into a
konstruct build, and a release install that actually worked, unlike the
"official" FC4 debacle. I'd imagine you would have many more running
FC4 if the users could bring FC4.2 install glitches here, but we've
been told pointedly we're on our own, so those cd's are still in my
carry case, unused.
Very good example. What kind of community is it that can't
be bothered to respin the official isos once in a while so the
known-broken install on certain hardware gets fixed and the user
that manages to install isn't immediately faced with a gig of
update downloads just to get started?
Nobody stopped anyone from doing the work involved. In fact it was
already done before. http://fedora.isphuset.no/
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
