On 1/22/06, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Nobody stopped anyone from doing the work involved. In fact it was > already done before. http://fedora.isphuset.no/ I think the underlying frustration involving the re-spins is one of access and branding. You want it to be accessible for people having problems with the regular installer, but you don't want everyone assuming its an 'official' iso built by the normal release process. There is a lot more discussion that needs to happen to see how respins, which the core maintainers aren't responsible for, should be branded and should be talked about in easily accessible documentation. Discussion I was hoping the Foundation could take up at some point. Can a respin project get their own bugzilla component in the same bugzilla? I keep forgetting to ping the http://fedora.isphuset.no/ guys to make sure they have written greg concerning trademark permission for the respins. It's an important usage case, which the trademark policy should try to explicitly address. -jef
