Re: Why questions don't get answered, or "No, I've already RTFM, tell me the answer!"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 12/31/05, Antonio Olivares <[email protected]> wrote:
--- Arthur Pemberton <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 12/30/05, Antonio Olivares
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ok!  We can still get all the goodies, no problem
> a
> > little bit of work.  I can live with that, but
> other
> > people want the cake and eat it too.  Thank you
> for
> > the explanation.  I thought that the Fedora
> Foundation
> > upon release from Red Hat's grip, would allow for
> > inclusion of the programs that could not be added
> > because of licensing issues.
> Users who want everything so neatly and conviently
> packaged should pony up
> cash to pay for the non-free things they wish to
> enjoy. And in all fairness,
> by the graces of the guys at Livna and ATrpms, all
> these free things can
> easily be added to a fresh install.
> Do I sense some Red Hat dislike in your tone?

Not at all.  Red Hat sponsors Fedora which I like and
all those things I can get on my own.  I personally do
not mind going through other packages and getting what
I want and configure the system to my liking.  It was
an honest question which many people ask and they do
not get a clear answer.

Fair enough. I was just curious. May the site needs to make this very clear somehow.

> I think it is fair to say this is not the longest
> thread. Earlier  this
> year there was a thread about top posting and other
> bad list practices, that
> thread was very long if I remember correctly.
Yes, but this one is not too far behind.

I suspect you maybe right, pity we have know way of knowing for sure.

As a boy I jumped through Windows, as a man I play with Penguins.

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux