John Summerfied wrote:
Kam Leo wrote:
On 12/29/05, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Kam Leo wrote:
On 12/29/05, Dave Stevens <geek@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
and there's fedorafaq.org. not comprehensive but pretty good and as
far as I
know everything there is accurate, easy to read, etc.
d
The problem with all these fedora*.org sites is that some are and some
are not officially affiliated with the main htttp://fedora.redhat.com
site. The fedora marketing droids need to really get the "fedora"
branding straightened out. There are too many of these "fedora*.org"
sites popping up and the ones officially affiliated are not tightly
coupled to the main site.
The only official ones are http://fedora.redhat.com and
http://fedoraproject.org as listed in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites and they are pretty well coupled
together. Rest of the community websites are listed in
for some reason I thought fedoralegacy.org was official.
Official in what sense? It is not sponsored by Red Hat Co.
[snip]
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
