On 12/29/05, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Kam Leo wrote: > > >On 12/29/05, Dave Stevens <geek@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >>and there's fedorafaq.org. not comprehensive but pretty good and as far as I > >>know everything there is accurate, easy to read, etc. > >> > >>d > >> > >> > >> > > > >The problem with all these fedora*.org sites is that some are and some > >are not officially affiliated with the main htttp://fedora.redhat.com > >site. The fedora marketing droids need to really get the "fedora" > >branding straightened out. There are too many of these "fedora*.org" > >sites popping up and the ones officially affiliated are not tightly > >coupled to the main site. > > > > > The only official ones are http://fedora.redhat.com and > http://fedoraproject.org as listed in > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites and they are pretty well coupled > together. Rest of the community websites are listed in > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CommunityWebsites and managing them is not > really a function of "fedora marketing droids". > Isn't "Fedora" trademarked? So shouldn't the marketing droids set the legal beagles upon the unofficial sites? > -- > Rahul >
