On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 19:32 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
> No, it isn't. If it was a real bounce, it would go back to redhat's mail
> system because the envelope sender address for list messages (which is
> where bounces go) is fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx On a list of this
> size there will be lots of bounces for each outgoing message simply as a
> result of email address churn, temporarily broken mail systems etc.
>
The only way to do it is to use a unique sender address for each
confirmation (eg: fedora-tqmcube-com-fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx or a
numerical identifier). It would be easy to script and requires that the
MTA have a catch-all.
--
Our DNSRBL -
Eliminate Spam: http://www.TQMcube.com/spam_trap.htm
Zombie Graphs: http://www.TQMcube.com/zombies.php
GeoGraphics: http://www.TQMcube.com/origins.php
