On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:14:27PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Note that the FSF definition of free is in contrast most other uses of > the word. Java is 'not-free' only in that fanatical sense. This a is an obviously loaded post, but I'll reply anyway. Fanatical or not, it's not *practically* free enough to be included in Fedora, because its license forbids it. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> Current office temperature: 85 degrees Fahrenheit.
