Am Sa, den 25.06.2005 schrieb ha haha um 17:16: > The 1.4.2 tree and 1.5 tree difference is something > like difference 2.4 kernel tree and 2.6 kernel tree, > both kernel trees are well maintained. But when you > have a chance to install a new machine, would you > prefer 2.4 kernel over 2.6? either for security or for > features or for performance or for easy maintenance? Your cited yourself the FC4 release notes recommendation: "Sun Java 1.5+ is recommended for stability purposes." So what's your point? > > I don't really understand what confuses you. You may > > review Sun's page > > and the jpackage.org page (non-free section!). > > > > I want a FREE version, best open-sources if possible, > of everything on FC4 Linux. Sun's Java isn't free - period. Then live with the Java FC4 ships with in Core. > Offering an old free demonstration version to allure > users to pay for non-free version can not touch me at > all, if this is the case. What is the "old free demonstration version" you speak about? Where do you have to "pay" for a non-free version? Alexander P.S. It would be nice to speak to someone with a real name. -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp Serendipity 17:56:02 up 48 min, 17 average: 0.27, 0.21, 0.18
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
